Introduction | Historical Background | Chronology | Geography | Biography | Technology | Ownership and Financing | General Bibliography |
Northwestern
States |
South Dakota | Sioux Falls |
Sioux Falls was incorporated as a village in 1876 and as a city in 1883.
The city
of Sioux Falls granted an exclusive twenty-year franchise to William S.
Kuhn to build water work on April 9, 1884. He built a system that
began operating in September, 1884. The Sioux Falls Water Company
was incorporated on June 26, 1884 and Kuhn transferred the system to
them on July 22, 1885. The system got off
to a rocky start and the company implemented many improvements.
Kuhn and others formed the American
Water Works and Guarantee Company (Limited) in 1886.
The system was sold to the South Dakota Water Company on June 30, 1890.
After
several failed attempts to take over the water system, the city held an
election on November 5, 1901 at which 1,184 votes were cast in favor of
building water works, with 313 opposed.
The city began construction of the new system in 1903, but a federal circuit court injunction halted work. After the injunction was dissolved by the court of appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case, work continued and the system began operation in October, 1906. Courts ruled that the company has no right to operate, and it suspended operations on July 1, 1908.
Water is supplied by the City of Sioux Falls
References
1884 "Sioux
Falls Water-Works," letter by W.S. Kuhn, Jr., Engineering News
12:250-251 (November 22, 1884)
1885 Sioux Falls, from Engineering News 14:124-125 (August 22, 1885).
1888 "Sioux Falls," from Manual of American Water Works, Volume 1.
1890 "Sioux Falls," from Manual of American Water Works, Volume 2.
1891 "Sioux Falls," from Manual of American Water Works, Volume 3.
1897 "Sioux Falls," from Manual of American Water Works, Volume 4.
1899 History
of Minnehaha County, South Dakota, by Dana Reed Bailey
Pages 388-393: The Sioux Falls Water Works.
1901 The
Daily Bond Buyer 24:586 (November 29, 1901)
Sioux Falls water bonds
1903 Wells v. City of Sioux Falls, et al., 16 S.D. 547, April 9, 1903, Supreme Court of the State of South Dakota
1904 Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. City of Sioux Falls et al., 131 Fed 890, July 11, 1904, Circuit, District of South Dakota.
1905 City of Sioux Falls et al. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. et al., 136 Fed 721, March 31, 1905, Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
1905 Farmer's Loan and Trust company, the South Dakota Water Company, W. S. Kuhn, and Sioux Falls Water Company, appellants. vs. City of Sioux Falls, Gorge W. Burnside, Mayor, et al., Transcript of Record, June 12, 1905. Includes many relevant documents.
1905 Farmer's Loan and Trust Co. v. City of Sioux Falls, 199 U.S. 601, October 23, 1905, United States Supreme Court, writ of certiorari denied. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
1905 "Sioux
Falls, S. Dak.," Fire and Water Engineering 38:344 (December
16, 1905)
On the application of the American Waterworks and Guarantee company, the
United States court at Sioux Falls, S. Dak., has appointed a receiver for
the South Dakota Water company, a private corporation, which for more than
twenty years has supplied that city with water. The American Waterworks
and Guarantee company is security for the bonds issued by the South Dakota
Water company. In its complaint filed in the United States court it sets
forth that the South Dakota company is now in an insolvent condition, and
that it was forced to issue bonds in the sum of $300,000, which were sold
to the Farmers T rust company, of New York. The complaint further sets
forth that the company for which the American Waterworks and Guarantee
company is security is unable to meet the next installment of interest on
the bonds, amounting to $9,000. and is unable to keep up the running
expenses of the plant. The court appointed as receiver of the water
company, J. H. Purdy, of Pittsburg, president of the company, and
inpowered him to operate the plant. The only action that can now be taken
by the company against the city of Sioux Falls is to bring suit for the
collection of the sum of $40,212, which is claimed to he due for water
rent. The city will also have a claim against the water company for the
enforced inactivity of the municipal waterworks system, the water company
a year or two ago having been compelled by Judge Carland to furnish a bond
to cover these damages.
1908 "Dual
Water Service," Public Service: Electricity, Gas, Water,
Telephones, Tramway 4:5-6 (January, 1908)
How Sioux Falls, South Dakota, is prospering with a costly municipal water
works, competing for business with a private company.
1908 "Sioux Falls Water Franchise has Expired," Municipal Engineering 34(6):373-374 (June, 1908)
1908 "Water
Famine Hits Sioux Falls July 1," The Mitchell Capital
(Mitchell, South Dakota) July 3, 1908, Page 1.
200 consumers will go thirsty when the old water company quits.
1913 "Receiver's Sale of Judgment," Argus-Leader (Sioux Falls, South Dakota), December 16, 1913, Page 6.
1925 "Victory in Waterworks Case of 20 Years Ago was Most Expensive Ever Gained by Municipality in State," by C. O. Bailey, The Daily Argus-Leader (Sioux Falls, South Dakota) March 28, 1925, Page 13.
2016 "The Sioux Falls South Dakota Typhoid Epidemic of 1885: Lessons in Politics and Public Health," by Henry Travers, 46th Annual Meeting of the American Osler Society, May 3, 2016
© 2019 Morris A. Pierce